|
MICHAEL CLAYTON—James Newton Howard
Out of all the choices in this year’s Oscar category, Michael Clayton seems to be the oddest of the lot at first. But what one hears in this score is an intriguing blend of an urban film scoring style. There are some aspects of minimalism here unlike that of say Glass or John Adams. Howard instead takes small motivic ideas and repeats them in his texture. Sometimes these are tonal (that is featuring some melodic contour), sometimes these are non-tonal (that is either based on percussion or drum machine sounds, or ambient design ideas), and sometimes these are harmonic.
While all these aspects make for a rather underwhelming experience when heard as a CD presentation, they can provide a sense of background continuity musically to a scene. The score tends to focus more on underpinning inner conflict of characters, trying to lend a subtle musical suggestion to the underlying conflict of the character or of a particular scene. This often means that the music seems to remain relatively static at times creating tension through repetition of these smaller ideas instead of with huge orchestral swells. The score tries then to get under the skin of it the audience in subtle unaffecting ways that create a sense of coldness to the score that make it unique.
Lately there have been plenty of composers experimenting with pure sound design as music. These have been relatively experimental scores often really hard to crack and even harder to listen to even though one can admire the attempts (Paul Haslinger has been doing this a lot, and Brian Tyler explored this approach in Bug). Howard has tried to find a way here to more fully integrate this technique into the fabric of his music. Sound design as an instrument, rather than an effect, is the result and it is on great display throughout this score. You might wonder why that is important and in order to understand that it is worth remembering how composers experimented with adding in synthesizers and electronic effects when these opportunities first appeared. Back when Goldsmith was exploring these things, the Academy was fairly conservative and only a couple of scores made it into the final 5. Patton tentatively explored the echoplex and this technique of manipulation of sound was at least given a nod, as was the odd, aleatoric approach that John Williams took for Images. But it has been difficult to find scores that are able to integrate non-traditional sound with standard orchestral music that really work without overwhelming the picture. And so, with Michael Clayton, we have at least one way that composers might consider in approaching the modern drama. The problem is that this is very difficult to make work and still maintain one’s individuality.
Throughout Howard’s score, we rarely get any kind of harmonic epiphany as it plays out. Things are always fairly static until we come to “Times Square.” This particular cue encapsulates a lot of Howard’s approach here as subtle string lines are overcome by an almost magical synthetic sound idea leading to a mini-climax on a major chord. It’s not much, but it does pack more of an emotional punch musically. As the CD progresses, Howard begins to incorporate more of the cues that feature these small climactic pushes and does a great job of never letting them go to the point of feeling fully satisfied. This is another mark of the score’s importance that it leaves us as frustrated as its title character. Howard also demonstrates an ability to create larger musical structure in these cues. A lot of film music taking the sound design approach tends to suffer from truncated musical ideas and very short cues. Here, Howard is able to expand and extend this for longer sequences, heard in “I’m Not the Guy You Kill” and “25 Dollars Worth” most effectively—a cue that takes a page from trance music in some respects. When acoustic instruments do appear prominently, we take notice in a way that we might not have before, and this often helps create some sense of closure to a particular scene or musical idea that, while subtle, is quite effective.
While many had hoped Shire’s Zodiac would be on the list this year, this particular score bears some resemblance to the approach in that film. Shire’s score tends to work from a deconstructed thematic idea, whereas Howard is working from a deconstructed musical climax…working away from the kind of forward buildup we expect in the score, teasing us with the possibilities of what might happen, but in the end leaving us wondering, where could this all head.
Five Reasons Why this Should Receive the Oscar
1. It displays a rethinking of what “music” is and blurs that distinction with ambient sound design.
2. The score explores an alternative approach to minimalist style in film music while also incorporating a pop style, trance, into its musical language.
3. The score uses sound design more as a musical instrument in the texture rather than as a special effect.
4. The score demonstrates how one can build smaller climaxes without heavily relying on thematic development.
5. Using small gestures instrumentally, or within the sound design, demonstrate a command of underscoring a scene without overwhelming it.
Recent Comments