I don't generally post on Sunday, but trying to catch up from last week. Here is the second of 3 reviews from the Minnesota Orchestra's fascinating Beethoven cycle. (Part 1 was posted Feb. 6.)
Symphony #9 in d, “Choral”, Op. 125 (BIS 1616)
The final of the first three releases in this cycle features Beethoven’s crowning achievement. It comes before we get to hear this orchestra and conductor’s performances of the 1st, 2nd, 6th, and 7th symphonies. I have not yet heard a performance of this work that makes me think of it as definitive. Perhaps that is because we all have our own views as to what this sounds like. So releasing this last piece in the middle of the cycle is a wise move since it allows us to hear the work on its own before assessing it as part of Vanska’s complete survey of these symphonies.
Vanska gives us an exciting study in contrasts with the vivid orchestral colors enhanced by BIS’s recording engineers. Listen in at around 8:00 in the first movement and the separation of the various instrumental sections is just amazing to hear. The string lines are crystal clear and the energy that surges underneath drives the music forward. The subsequent wind section is equally wonderful to behold. All of the comments about the other performances in this cycle hold true here as well. There is a hint that this is the symphony that begins to land closer to the later Romantic ideal. Yet, Vanska is not interested in connecting this historically to Brahms. Instead we have a symphony with a style that is both a unique testament to Beethoven’s musical contribution and a symphony that one can hear the pre-history of say Haydn’s final “London” symphonies. Here Beethoven truly can be heard taking the form and motivic development to a new level.
The tempo in the Scherzo is simply breathtaking. It is not that the pace is too fast, it is due to the orchestra responding again in uniform fashion to the various accents and musical textual guides in true fashion as one mind instead of as 75 or more people making their own musical statement. This is what has continuously set these performances apart from being simple run throughs of familiar music.
The operatic recitative like orchestral statements are truly instrumental statements without a lot of overly emotive phraseology. Vanska just lets them play themselves out so that they sound a bit more like thoughts preceding from the whole rather than some deep-seated philosophical juggernaut. For that we must wait and let the text speak for itself thus pulling us into the exhilarating choral sections. And what a chorus the Minnesota Chorale is as well. The diction clear and precise and they sound so much a part of the orchestra as a whole. We finally get to hear vocal sound as an extension of the orchestral palette. The solos have the feel that a musician in the orchestra is so moved that they must rise and sing along. Each of the solo voices complement one another well. The little marching band that shows up halfway in is just as delightful as it grows in its own variation of the theme.
This is by all accounts one of the finer 9ths. Someone asked me how many standard repertoire recordings they needed. It is a good question. But I would say in an age where music is so accessible to all that these BIS recordings remind us why we must support our regional orchestras and why music is a living art. Memorializing performances of great masterpieces is an honorable task and 100 years from now someone will still be recording and performing these works in even more intriguing ways. Vanska’s recordings remind us that sometimes we need to let the musical text speak for itself, get out of the way, and let a great orchestra be led with intelligence and understanding perform. The results are worth every penny.
Part three of this review will focus on the release of Symphonies 4 & 5 which launched the series in 2004.


Recent Comments